Positive and Negative Implications of Bureaucracy
Researchers have voiced their opposing viewpoints regarding bureaucracy based on positive and negative implications. Hummel (1987) stated that bureaucracy should not survive since the modern institutions and organizational structures are based on team work and communal system of principles which necessitate increased effectiveness in communication and consumer satisfaction. On the other hand, Goodshell (1985) seeks the preservation of bureaucracy as a social asset due to the delivery of goods and services in a fair and just manner. Taking a slightly innovative approach is Perrow (1986) who believes that evolution from bureaucracy is necessary which can be achieved by integrating rationality with other novel external environments. Transcendence form bureaucracy is the view proposed by Denhardt (1981) who asserts that it is vital to investigate and find novel values and morals of individual sovereignty rather than looking for new structures in place of bureaucracy. Benefits of Bureaucracy Weber (1968) comprehended bureaucracy as a structural organization or establishment which imparts several benefits to organizations. He believed bureaucracy to be beneficial in terms of the effectiveness which it promotes by providing stable workplaces. Other potential benefits as noted by Weber include the increased productivity of workplaces due to the precision and reliability of bureaucracy in institutions which ultimately resulted in enhanced lifestyles (Weber, 1968). Bureaucracy is also considered to be an instrument and a rational tool for implementing the orders of leaders who have been elected. From this outlook, it considered to be an efficient system of machinery to guarantee the implementation of scheduled tasks and assigned jobs which are measurable on the efficacy of the desired rationale (Olsen, 2006). Bureaucratic organizations enable the identification and legitimate utility of power and sources by determining the people, time and place when they can be utilized. Additionally, a bureaucratic structure ensures adherence and allegiance to commands and regulations by mangers and leaders in senior positions who are deemed to be trustees of the professional order (Olsen, 2006). Research confirms the positive impact of bureaucracy in organisations and its apparent contribution to harmony and synchronization of operations which assume high degree of accuracy and pace, especially in government organizations (Olsen, 2006). This is achieved through the neutrality and decrease in hostility between members of the organization and the reduction in the costs resulting from the reduced utility of personal resources in the institution. (This is only a random and should strictly be used as a sample only. To view the complete paper, e-mail us at support@customtermpaper.org or click here)